Preparation stops until the authorized commercial reviewer records a decision.
Concept preview — actions are intentionally disabled.
Review layer
The decision context stays attached to the work.
A reviewer should not need to reconstruct which source changed, what remains uncertain, or who owns the next decision.
01
Prepared work
02
Source and version
03
Confidence and exceptions
04
Edit, approve, return, or reject
05
Owner and due date
06
Audit history
Why the layer matters
Prepared work becomes reviewable work.
The interface is useful only when it makes human judgment easier, safer, and easier to audit.
See why the work was prepared
Keep the source, version, confidence, and unresolved exceptions beside the output.
Keep decisions with responsible people
Edit, approve, return, or reject work inside an explicit approval boundary.
Retain the decision trail
Record the owner, due date, revision, and outcome for later review and measurement.
Synthetic approval record
One prepared output can have several human boundaries.
Technical facts, product direction, price, and customer release do not share the same owner. The review layer must preserve those separate responsibilities.
A Pilot configuration, not a released self-service workflow builder.
Synthetic public data, with no customer files or internal prices.
Existing business systems remain the source of record during the Pilot.
No customer-facing release without a recorded human decision.
Validate the review method before treating it as a product.
This concept shows the intended Pilot review experience. Shared workspace features, integrations, permissions, and subscription packaging remain future product work.